Write short notes on :
Dalit Movement
Dalit Movement History
testifies the presence of social splits in Indian society, in terms of estate,
class, gender and the suchlike. Similar splits has changed the entire social
fabric of Indian society, whereby the exploited section, be it the Dalits,
adivasis or women, have been totally pushed to the fringe by the traditional
Brahmanical structure of oppression. Dalits are the people who are
economically, socially, politically exploited from centuries. Unfit to live in
the society of mortal beings, they've been living outside the vill depending on
lower position of occupation, and lived as ― untouchable . Dalit Movement This
exploitation is due to the demarcation followed by age old estate hierarchical
tradition in the Hindu society. This scale has been the cause for oppression of
Dalits in each and every sphere of society since centuries. It has subordinated
them to a life of poverty and demotion. The Dalits (ex-untouchables), Dalit
Movement who have been severely exploited by the so- called upper gentries,
pause outside the Varnasrama proposition and were appertained to as rejects
inpre-independent India. India attained independence, but the Dalits weren't
allowed to live a life with quality and equivalency. It's this idea of ‗
equivalency, which sparked the morning of the Dalit Movement in India, as a
kick to the age-old atrocities committed against them. Dalit movement is a
struggle that tries to fight attack the socio – artistic ascendance of the
upper gentries. It's a movement of the millions that craves for justice through
the speeches, erudite workshop, dramatizations, songs, artistic organisations
and all the other possible measurers. So it can be called as a movement which
has been led by Dalits to seek equivalency with all other gentries of the Hindu
society. Dalit Movement The main ideal of the Dalit Movement was to establish a
society in India grounded on social equivalency. The indigenous identity,
still, fails to capture the true picture. The real picture is commodity
different which will be reflected in this paper, in the light of the four books
including Debrahmanising History, Poisoned Bread, The Incarcerations We Broke
and Dalit Fancies. Dalit Movement
Dalits, the group of people who constitute the
last order of gentries in the Varnasrama Theory. This is the traditional
description of the term Dalit as is given by different scholars. According to
the Indian Constitution the Dalits are the people coming under the order ‗
Slated gentries‘. With slight changes, still, the term ‗ Dalit‘would mean not
Only one order of estate, it means the human who's exploited economically,
socially, politically and from all the spheres of life, by the traditions of
the country. By tradition would mean the ‗ Brahmanical Indian tradition‘
prevailing in the country for centuries. A Dalit doesn't believe in God,
religion as propagated by the Hindu Good Book and religious textbooks, as
because it's these tradition only that have made them slaves. A Dalit is the
person who has the consummation of the sorrows and struggles of those in the
smallest stratum of the society. The Dalits, called by different names like
Dasyu, Dasa, Atisudra, Panchama, Tirukulattar, Adikarnataka, Adi Dravida, are
actually the ― Depressed Classes ‖ of Indian society. Dalit is one who believes in
equivalency, who practices equivalency and who combats inequality. A Dalit is
the religionist of Humanism — the ultimate testament of mortal beings. The real
symbol of present Dalit is ‗ Change and Revolution‘. Thus, any existent from
any estate order ( including the Brahmin), will be considered a Dalit given the
fact that the person is depressed and exploited, aspire to attain equivalency
through change and revolution, being the establishment religionist of the
testament of ‗ Humanism‘
. The Dalits and women in
India are, at present, distributed under the marginalized sections of the
society. All these gentries (Pariahs, Chamars, Mahars, Bhangis and so on)
partake a common condition of exploitation and oppression by the so called
upper gentries of the Indian society. Still, it'll be plant that the root cause
is the conformation of the ‗ Caste System‘which actually led to the oppression
of the other orders of tyrannized classes of India – the women, If we trace
back to the literal ages. It was with the Aryans who entered the country from
Middle East and settled in the rich land of the Ganges after a fight with the
indigenous people of the civilization. The people, well clued in the ways as
shown in literal aspects, were defeated by the Aryans. The Minority Aryans
defeated the maturity Dalits by the use of their tactics of Divide and Rule, as
assumed by Braj Ranjan Mani because without doing so they wo n‘t be suitable to
master the maturity. The Brahmins had retain this tactic indeed moment.
Latterly in the vedic period, the conformation of the Rig Veda laid the
foundation of the oppression of the people in their own land, with the Purusha
shukta in its tenth book. It was latterly in the 5th century that people of
Shudra Varna were converted to untouchable. And this led to morning of the
Brahmin domination accompanied by Dalit exploitation. A Brahman is a great God,
whether he's learned or imbecile and the Brahmans which strives for an unstable
society, a society where a certain group of people are given the status of God,
in total discrepancy with the other group who are considered indeed worse than
creatures. God who's considered as the Almighty don't live, but is considered
as the Supreme power. Is it that the Arya-Brahmins, cooked the institution of
Varna and thereby estate, in order that they consider themselves as the ‗
Supreme‘. By putting themselves in the supreme position, they actually wanted
to attain superior status, a life of quality, and aspired to be adhered by
everyone in the Indian society. Caste, the veritably creation of man and not
God, is now embedded forcefully in the Indian society, through the religion of
maturity Hinduism. Gail Omvedt in her book ― Dalit Fancies ‖, equated Hinduism
with Brahmanism. Hinduism is constructed in order to hide the discriminative
laws of Brahmanism under a religion to be considered as the religion of the
country, and thereby adhered without any question. The estate testament is
innovated in the binary religious doctrines of Karma and Dharma. And that it
was the introductory duty of every existent to maintain Dharma which was to
retain the social structure grounded on the Varnasrama Theory. Not only Manu,
Kautilya, another Brahmin, also emphasized on retaining the Caste structure as
the introductory structure of Indian society that can not and shouldn't be
changed. The same was asserted by Gandhi, the Father of the Nation, to change
is to produce disorder2. This means that the Brahmins should stay at the top of
the aggregate and the Dalits at the bottom. Indeed if the Dalits die under the
situation, they shouldn't be upraised. This is Brahmanism – religionist of
inequality, the roots of which lie in the ancient Vedas. Formulated 3500
thousand times back, the Vedas are ruling Indian society indeed now, through
its instrument – Hinduism. It's controlling the minds of the people, which made
the nonage groups – the Brahmins to be the policy makers of the country. And in
order to retain their position they've cooked myths. For case, they cooked the
myth of ‗ Punarjanma‘which explains the marvels of ‗re-birth‘. It explains that
the conditioning of our once janma, is responsible for our present status, and
the conditioning of present will decide our life afterre-bith. This myth has
two connotationsFirstly, the Dalits should accept the exploitation done against
them as the result of their own deeds of once birth. They should consider that
they committed some bad deeds due to which they're facing similar kind of
oppression.
Secondly, indeed if they're exploited in this
birth, they shouldn't protest, which will give them a good life in the coming
birth afterre-birth. That's with the desire to get happiness in the coming
birth, they should cry. Because it's believed that, God will help them to come
out of torture, and that the Brahmins being Gods are the only result for
theirdistress.However, the end to write these textbooks come clear, which is to
establish and maintain Brahmanical ascendance, If these textbooks are observed
nearly in socio – literal perspective.
Critically analyse the poem “Jasmine Creeper under a Banyan Tree’.
Comment on the issue discussed in the novel Kocharethi:The Araya Woman.
Critically analyse the representation of women in ‘Liandova and Tuaisiala’.
Metaphor of the tree in Changia Rukh
Metaphor of the tree in
Changia Rukh Balbir Madhopuri’s autobiography, Changiya Rukh, has a noteworthy
title. It refers to a tree that has been bobbed off at the top, sliced, and
suppressed. Madhopuri utilizes it as a conceit for a Dalit or‘
untouchable’Indian whose development eventuality has been “ burgled” by the
Hindu social system. The head cut tree also symbolises the tree’s ingrain and
rebellious continuity in producing new branches and leaves. Changiya Rukh, set
in the Punjabi village of Madhopuri, recounts the Dalit community’s social
history and highlights estate relations grounded on prejudice and injustice. Metaphor
of the tree in Changia RukhMadhopuri’s perspective, Metaphor of the tree in
Changia Rukhon the other hand, is suitable to grasp and delicately depict the
plight of Dalits living on the fringe of society in colorful areas of the
nation. Madhopuri describes the nippiness of actuality amid all indigenous and
legislative sweats with honesty and genuine equity. This true tale of a Dalit’s
anguish of difficulty, social insulation, and demotion, as well as resistance,
success, and stopgap, is a triumphant trip. Metaphor of the tree in Changia
Rukh
In Changiya Rukh, Madhopuri uses the image of
the tree frequently, most specially in the chapter “ The Banyan Tree of the
Chamars,” where the narrator’s father Bhaia reflections, “ Just look at the way
these trees cleave to each other, it’s nearly insolvable for the air to get
through.” These two had hugged without saying anything or allowing about it.
And then’s a joe who does n’t want another man to approach him. (Against The
Night, Changia Rukh)
. The hostility that exists
between humans is varied then with the strong connection that exists between
trees. The textbook’s Bargad tree seems to be a significant reference point for
the narrator. It's erected on land bought by the region’s Dalits. As a result,
it's a position people can claim as their own. As stated in the textbook-the
marla of sixteen,
. Their clan bought 484
square yards of property beneath the bargad from Kartar Singh of Neevan Vehra.
No documents were inked, and the whole sale was conducted by word of mouth.
Indeed if they could go it, the law didn't allow Churas and Chamars to buy
property or construct homes, let alone to cultivate it. Changia Rukh (Against
The Night 134)
It's said that members of
other gentries, including Jats and Brahmins as well as carpenters, hairstylist,
relate to this position as the Bargad of the Chamars. Individualities belonging
to other gentries are displeased with the Bargad’s actuality. Because the tree
represents a trouble to their power, numerous Jats would use obscenities to
describe it. The reality of the matter is that the Bargad is located on land
belonging to the Dalit community. This frees them from the Jats, who would else
abuse the dalits in every way. Indeed while it may not sit well with the Jats,
the Dalits should be suitable to wander freely and make use of the Bargad tree
for livelihood, as well as rest beneath its shade and conduct carnivals. In
this sense, the tree poses a peril to the ultimate’s estate status. The Bargad
tree has been cut to the ground for this reason. The narrator expresses his
surprise at what has happed
“ Also there was the day I ’d noway imagined I
’d see. It was a memorable day in February 1972. It was an experience to
remember. The end of my tenth- grade term was approaching. I saw our banyan
peepal trees had been diced down when I returned home from academy. The sight
of the bombarded and crippled binary trees was too important to take. Their
thick, heavy branches were bestrew over the field. Chowkidar Jagar and his sons
were ruthlessly mincing and sawing at the massive tree caddies.”
The narrator is left with an emotional vacuum
after seeing the “ unsupportable sight” of the “ slaughtered” tree. The choice
of the picture of a hewn tree as the book’s title easily reflects the terrible
nature of the event. Madhopuri utilises the picture of a barren tree with its
top diced off as a conceit for his society and himself. From this perspective,
the tree may represent a Dalit or untouchable Indian who has been denied a
healthy and happy actuality, or a Dalit whose eventuality for development has
been stifled by the Hindu order’s established estate scales.
At the same time,‘changiya rukh’may allude to
the tree’s inconceivable resiliency and capacity to revitalize itself by
sprouting new branch shoots. From this edge point, we may see the injustice
done to the tree or the dalits, but what's emphasised then's the people’s
capacity to express themselves and repel injustice, not the quantum of
violence. Metaphor of the tree in Changia Rukh