Historical Diffusionism: This school of thought emerged in the late 19th century and early 20th century. Its proponents believed that all cultural traits could be traced back to a single origin, and that diffusion occurred through direct contact between cultures. They argued that similarities between cultures were due to diffusion from a single source, rather than independent invention or cultural convergence. The drawback of historical diffusionism is that it was often based on speculative and ethnocentric assumptions.
Culture Area
Diffusionism: This school of thought emerged in the mid-20th century. Its
proponents argued that cultural traits could be traced back to specific
regions, and that diffusion occurred within these regions rather than across
the world. They believed that cultural traits spread through a process of
cultural borrowing and adaptation within specific cultural regions. The
drawback of culture area diffusionism is that it can lead to oversimplification
and the neglect of cultural complexity.
Describe the elements
that leads to diffusion Discuss the three schools of diffusionism highlighting
their history and drawbacks
Neo-Diffusionism:
This school of thought emerged in the 1960s and 1970s. Its proponents argued
that diffusion occurred through multiple channels, including migration, trade,
and communication, and that cultural change was a complex and dynamic process.
They emphasized the importance of studying the mechanisms of diffusion and the
social context in which it occurs. The drawback of neo-diffusionism is that it
can lead to an overemphasis on the role of diffusion and neglect the role of
independent invention and cultural convergence.
Diffusionism is
a theoretical framework that explains how cultural, social, and technological
traits spread across different societies. There are three main schools of
diffusionism: historical diffusionism, culture area diffusionism, and
neo-diffusionism. Each of these schools of thought has a distinct history and
drawbacks.
Historical
Diffusionism: Historical diffusionism emerged in the late 19th century and
early 20th century. This school of thought was characterized by the belief that
all cultural traits could be traced back to a single origin, and that diffusion
occurred through direct contact between cultures. The proponents of historical
diffusionism argued that similarities between cultures were due to diffusion
from a single source, rather than independent invention or cultural
convergence.
The main
drawback of historical diffusionism is that it was often based on speculative
and ethnocentric assumptions. For example, some historical diffusionists
claimed that all cultures ultimately originated from the ancient civilization
of Egypt or the lost continent of Atlantis. This kind of speculation led to the
neglect of the agency of different societies and cultures, and a failure to
recognize the complexity of cultural interactions and processes.
Culture Area
Diffusionism: Culture area diffusionism emerged in the mid-20th century. This
school of thought argued that cultural traits could be traced back to specific
regions, and that diffusion occurred within these regions rather than across
the world. Proponents of culture area diffusionism believed that cultural
traits spread through a process of cultural borrowing and adaptation within
specific cultural regions.
The main
drawback of culture area diffusionism is that it can lead to oversimplification
and the neglect of cultural complexity. For example, some proponents of culture
area diffusionism argued that all Native American cultures could be traced back
to a single source, and that similarities between different Native American
cultures were due to diffusion from this source. This kind of
oversimplification fails to recognize the diversity of Native American cultures
and the complex cultural interactions that occurred among them.
Neo-Diffusionism:
Neo-diffusionism emerged in the 1960s and 1970s. This school of thought
emphasized the importance of studying the mechanisms of diffusion and the
social context in which it occurs. Neo-diffusionists argued that diffusion
occurred through multiple channels, including migration, trade, and
communication, and that cultural change was a complex and dynamic process.
For SOLVED PDF & Handwritten
WhatsApp No :- 7838475019
The main
drawback of neo-diffusionism is that it can lead to an overemphasis on the role
of diffusion and neglect the role of independent invention and cultural
convergence. For example, some neo-diffusionists argued that the spread of
capitalism and modernization across the world was mainly due to diffusion from
the West, neglecting the agency of non-Western societies in shaping their own
modernization processes. This kind of neglect fails to recognize the complexity
and diversity of cultural interactions and the role of multiple factors in
shaping cultural change.