The Permanent Settlement, also known as the Zamindari System, was introduced in British India in 1793 as a way to create a stable system of land revenue collection. The objectives of the Permanent Settlement were to provide a fixed revenue to the British East India Company, to create a class of loyal intermediaries between the British and the Indian peasantry, and to encourage agricultural development.
However, the
success of the Permanent Settlement in attaining its objectives is a matter of
debate. While the system did provide a fixed revenue to the East India Company,
it created a class of zamindars or intermediaries who were often exploitative
and oppressive towards the Indian peasantry. The zamindars, who were granted
hereditary rights over land revenue collection, often charged exorbitant rents
and taxes and were not accountable to the British administration.
Was the Permanent
Settlement successful in attaining its objectives Discuss
Furthermore,
the Permanent Settlement did not lead to the expected increase in agricultural
development. Instead, the zamindars, who had a vested interest in maintaining
the status quo, often discouraged technological innovations and improvements in
agriculture that could have increased productivity.
Overall, while
the Permanent Settlement did achieve some of its objectives, such as providing
a fixed revenue to the British East India Company, it did not lead to the
development of a loyal class of intermediaries or significant agricultural
development. Instead, it created a system of exploitation and oppression that
contributed to the impoverishment of Indian peasants and ultimately contributed
to the growth of Indian nationalism and resistance to British colonial rule.
The Permanent
Settlement, also known as the Zamindari System, was introduced in British India
in 1793 as a way to create a stable system of land revenue collection. The
objectives of the Permanent Settlement were to provide a fixed revenue to the
British East India Company, to create a class of loyal intermediaries between
the British and the Indian peasantry, and to encourage agricultural
development.
In terms of
providing a fixed revenue to the East India Company, the Permanent Settlement
was successful. The system ensured a fixed land revenue collection from the
zamindars, which provided a stable source of income to the Company. However,
the system did not lead to significant agricultural development, and the class
of loyal intermediaries between the British and the Indian peasantry was not
effectively created.
Moreover, the
zamindars were often exploitative towards the Indian peasants, charging
exorbitant rents and taxes and not being accountable to the British
administration. This led to the impoverishment of Indian peasants and
contributed to the growth of Indian nationalism and resistance to British
colonial rule.
In conclusion,
while the Permanent Settlement did achieve its objective of providing a fixed
revenue to the East India Company, it did not lead to the creation of a class
of loyal intermediaries or significant agricultural development. Additionally,
it created a system of exploitation and oppression that contributed to the
impoverishment of Indian peasants and ultimately contributed to the growth of
Indian nationalism and resistance to British colonial rule.
On one hand,
proponents of the Permanent Settlement argue that it helped create a stable
system of revenue collection that provided a fixed source of income to the East
India Company. They argue that it also encouraged zamindars to invest in
agriculture, leading to an increase in agricultural productivity.
On the other
hand, critics of the Permanent Settlement argue that it created a class of
zamindars who were often exploitative and oppressive towards the Indian
peasantry. The zamindars, who were granted hereditary rights over land revenue
collection, often charged exorbitant rents and taxes and were not accountable
to the British administration. This led to the impoverishment of Indian
peasants and contributed to the growth of Indian nationalism and resistance to
British colonial rule.
For SOLVED PDF & Handwritten
WhatsApp No :- 7838475019
Moreover, the
Permanent Settlement did not lead to the creation of a loyal class of
intermediaries between the British and the Indian peasantry, as the system
allowed zamindars to have complete control over land revenue collection without
any accountability. This contributed to the alienation of Indian peasants from
the British administration and contributed to the growth of anti-British
sentiment.
In conclusion,
the Permanent Settlement is a controversial system that has been the subject of
much debate and discussion. While it did achieve its objective of providing a
fixed revenue to the East India Company, it created a system of exploitation
and oppression that contributed to the impoverishment of Indian peasants and
ultimately contributed to the growth of Indian nationalism and resistance to
British colonial rule.