IGNOU MPYE 002 Solved Assignment 2022-23

 

MPYE 002 Solved Assignment 2022-23

MPYE 002 Solved Assignment 2022-23, MPYE 002 Solved Assignment 2022-23 , MPYE 002 Assignment 2022 , FREE MPYE 002 Assignment , IGNOU Assignments 2022-23- Gandhi National Open University had recently uploaded the assignments of this session for MASTER’S DEGREE PROGRAMME IN POLITICAL SCIENCE (MPS) for the year 2022-23. Students are recommended to download their Assignments from this webpage itself. MPYE 002 Solved Assignment 2022-23 They don’t need to go anywhere else when everything regarding the Assignments are available during this text only.

IGNOU MPYE 002 Solved Assignment 2022-23: for college kids – MPYE 002 ETHICS Solved Assignment 2022-23, Students are advised that after successfully downloading their Assignments, you’ll find each and every course assignments of your downloaded. Candidates got to create separate assignment for the IGNOU Master Course, so as that it’s easy for Evaluators to ascertain your assignments.

MPYE 002 ETHICS Solved Assignment 2022-23

 ETHICS (MPYE 002) TUTOR MARKED ASSIGNMENT

Course Code: MPYE 002

Assignment Code: Asst/TMA/2022-23

1. What is discourse ethics? Evaluate the rules of argumentation in discourse ethics given by Habermass.

Ans. Habermas’s discourse ethics is his attempt to explain the implications of communicative rationality in the sphere of moral insight and normative validity. It is a complex theoretical effort to reformulate the fundamental insights of Kantian deontological ethics in terms of the analysis of communicative structures. This means that it is an attempt to explain the universal and obligatory nature of morality by evoking the universal obligations of communicative rationality. It is also a cognitivist moral theory, which means it holds that justifying the validity of moral norms can be done in a manner analogous to the justification of facts. However, the entire project is undertaken as a rational reconstruction of moral insight. It claims only to reconstruct the implicit normative orientations that guide individuals and it claims to access these through an analysis of communication.

Public discourse ethics

This type of ethics consists of conversations about ideas in civic or community contexts marked by diversity of perspectives requiring thoughtful public engagement. This discourse is made up of differing insights that helps to shape the public’s engagement with one another. This type of discourse is meant to protect and to promote the public good. For public discourse ethics to be successful there must be an effective level of civility between people or persons involved. It was Sigmund Freud who once said, “civilization began the first time an angry person cast a word instead of a rock” and that statement is something that continues to be seen in society today. The Harvard Law Review accurately examines public discourse and explains it in a manner that is appropriate and conceptually accurate. “Every man who publishes a book commits himself to the judgement of the public, and anyone may comment upon his performance….Whatever their merits, others have a right to pass their judgement upon them-to censure them if they be censurable, and to turn them into ridicule if they be ridiculous”. For the public discourse ethics to be productive there must be accountability on the public stage as the Harvard Law Review calls into question. Without any act of accountability the ethicality of the discourse is no longer valid and cannot go on. Public accountability consists of three basic factors. The factors are:

·        a diversity of ideas,

·        an engagement of public decision making,
and finally

·        an account for continuing a practice or way of doing something or a means or reason for changing the practice.

Finally, public discourse ethics puts a great responsibility on the individual. They must continually be asking questions and finding answers. They will not always be right, and that is okay, as long as they are able to make a positive decision in the end.

2. What are the objections of Karl-Otto Apel against previous moral theories? Discuss.

Ans. Cognitivist ethics claims to use reason to show the validity of moral norms. However, it is a widely held view that objective facts and the laws of logic and mathematics are inter subjectively valid, but that the situation is different when it comes to values. No chance for a universal ethics. This would be a great dilemma since the rehabilitation and transformation of practical reason seems particularly urgent today. Ethics can no longer be a matter of face-to-face encounters only but must be rethought on a larger scale: it must take into account ‘globalisation’, the new situation we face in today’s world, whether we like it or not. This includes all issues concerning humanity as a whole, such as ecological problems as well as the continuing threat of weapons of mass destruction on the one hand, but also extensive world trade links and world-wide communication on the other hand.

Apel regards globalisation as “an irreversible fact”, which has taken place “ahead of our reflection”, and “a challenge”. He argues that though “it’s fashionable to be modest as a philosopher”, boldness is what the situation requires: “Philosophy should take the lead” in answering to this challenge.

Apel’s philosophy like Eminent learning and thorough knowledge of a great variety of philosophical literature are characteristic of his work. In his main publication, The Transformation of Philosophy, he takes inspiration from philosophers as diverse as Heidegger, Wittgenstein, Kant and Pierce. However, he engages with many other thinkers in the course of the book. This makes his work rich in philosophical content, but unfortunately also rather difficult to read, as he is expecting his readers to follow him through a jungle of professional jargon and a extensive maze of footnotes. Apel seems to move with ease in the terminology of these other authors, involving them in the genesis of his thought. He does this not only in order to frame his principal ideas but to act on them. Inspired by Pierce, Apel is convinced that philosophy emerges in a ‘communication community’ of philosophers, in the ‘argumentative discourse’ between thinkers, it is not the product of a thinker’s solitary quest for truth. He thinks it is important to involve philosophers in this endless discourse, even those who intended their work to be a monologue. It is only through such a ‘transformation of philosophy’ that philosophy acquires its proper form, in which it may do justice to the discursive character of the human context in which we live: As far as our environment discloses itself to us in language, human beings are compelled to use language to try to reach a consensus by argumentation. As practiced within the community of philosophers, philosophy may also serve as a model for political and scientific discourse.

Apel’s transformation of philosophy importantly refers to a transformation of ‘transcendental philosophy’, in other words it deals with the conditions necessary for knowledge to be possible. While Kant related this problem to human consciousness, to Apel it is communication, language in general, which is fundamental and necessary to it. In order to establish the possibility and validity of communication, a ‘transcendental language game’ in an ideal ‘communication community’ beyond all concrete language games has to be assumed. This theory includes the recognition of a principle of ‘communicative ethics’.

Apel’s ‘discourse ethics’ comprises two parts. While the first part deals with an ideal situation, part two is designed to examine the question of “how to act under non-ideal conditions’”. This includes the problems of how to respond to institutions, and how to act in the face of the functional restraints of the legal, political and economic system. Apel distinguishes between three different levels on which we operate when dealing with institutions. The most hopeful is a level ‘outside the institutions’, which empowers individuals to bring about political change. Here we are free to communicate and act as what Kant called ‘the reasoning public’. Today it is a global reasoning public.

3. Give answer of any two questions in about 250 words each. 

a) Evaluate the idea of war in the light of Deontology and Utilitarianism. 

b) What do you understand by Right to Life? Discuss the idea of dignified life in the context of cultural relativism and realism. 

4. Give answer of any four questions in about 150 words each. 
a) Write a note on the D. Ross’s idea of human duties.

b) Write a note on Cultural Relativism.

c) Write a note on the social responsibility of media. 

d) Write a note on MacIntyre’s virtue ethics. 
5. Write short notes on any five in about 100 words each. 

a) Panchasila

b) Svadharma 

c) Distributive Justice 

d) Situation Ethics 

e) Deontology 

Important Note: IF YOU NEED FULL ASSIGNMENT PDF YOU CAN WHATSPP ON THIS NO 7838475019

IGNOU MPS Guidelines 2022-23

Dear learner,

As explained in the Programme Guide, you will have to do a Tutor Marked Assignment for each course in Political Science. This booklet contains the assignments of the first year courses of the Masters Programme in Political Science.

You need to submit all the assignments within the stipulated time for being eligible to appear in the term-end examination. Before you attempt the assignments, please read the instructions carefully provided in the Programme Guide.

Important Note: IF YOU NEED FULL ASSIGNMENT PDF YOU CAN WHATSPP ON THIS NO 7838475019

It is important that you write the answers in your own words. Your answers should be within the approximate range of the word-limit set for a particular section. Remember, writing answers to assignment questions will improve your writing skills and prepare you for the term-end examination.

All assignments, including these, have to be submitted to the Coordinator of your Study Centre. Remember to obtain a receipt from the Study Centre for the assignments submitted and retain it. If possible, keep a Xerox copy of the assignments with you.

The Study Centre will have to return the assignments to you after they are evaluated. Please insist on this. The Study Centre will note down the marked awarded for each assignment and forward them to the Student Evaluation Division (SED) at IGNOU, New Delhi.

IGNOU Last Date for July 2022 Session and For January 2023 Session

Submission:

The completed assignments should be submitted as per the following schedule

For July 2022 Session - March 31, 2023

For January 2023 Session - September 30, 2023

Those students who had successfully submitted their Assignments to their allocated study centres can now check their Assignment Status. Along with assignment status, they can also checkout their assignment marks & result.

Where can I find Ignou solved assignment?

If you didn't get an Assignment Question yet then you can download it from the IGNOU Assignments section page. Just collect questions and start writing your assignment with the available solutions. IGNOU is very strict about checking of assignments submitted by students to IGNOU Study Centre.

How can we submit Ignou assignment?

Now students have to submit their assignments online to Madhyam before the scheduled date. You can submit your annual assignment through the online link. Through the online submission links issued by the university, you can submit your assignment from home.

How can I submit Ignou assignment online 2021?

The email must carry the following details of the sender:

1.     Name of the learner:

2.     Enrollment number:

3.     Regional Centre Code:

4.     Study Centre Code:

5.     Programme Code:

6.     Course Code(s) of attached assignments:

7.     Mobile number:

8.     Email ID:

How can I get first page of Ignou assignment?

The first page must include the following information.

1.     Name.

2.     Roll number.

3.     Address.

4.     Assignment number.

5.     Name of the course.

6.     Study Centre.

7.     Programme.

Date of submission.

MPYE 002 Solved Assignment 2022-23 You also directly download IGNOU Assignment Question Paper from – Follow the advice and Guidelines by IGNOU University, MPYE 002 Solved Assignment 2022-23 For checking Guidelines you can see your question paper clearly, after seeing the question paper candidate still have any query related with IGNOU Solved Assignment , they can ask to their teacher if Students want any information they also can contact us. We will provide all IGNOU Help – 8130208920 (From 10:00AM to 7:00PM)

IGNOU Assignment Status 2022-23

MPYE 002 ETHICS Solved Assignment 2022-23: Those students who had successfully submitted their Assignments to their allocated study centres can now check their Assignment Status. Alongside assignment status, they will also checkout their assignment marks & result. All this is often available in a web mode. After submitting the assignment, you'll check you IGNOU Assignment Status only after 3-4 weeks. it'd take 40 days to declare.

Those students who had successfully submitted their Assignments to their allocated study centres can now check their Assignment Status. Along with assignment status, they can also checkout their assignment marks & result. MPYE 002 Solved Assignment 2022-23 All this is available in an online mode. After submitting the assignment, you can check you IGNOU Assignment Status only after 3-4 weeks. It might take 40 days to declare.

MPYE 002  Solved Assignment 2022-23 Here the students can check their IGNOU Assignment Status, marks, result or both the sessions i.e; June & December.

Once the TEE assignments have been submitted to the Centres, it is send to the evaluation department. After which the evaluation of IGNOU Assignment Solutions takes place.

Here the scholars can check their IGNOU Assignment Status 2020, marks, result or both the sessions i.e; June & December.

MPYE 002 Solved Assignment 2022-23 Once the TEE assignments are submitted to the Centres, it's send to the evaluation department. After which the evaluation of IGNOU Assignment Solutions takes place.